TY 2020 Form 990 Schedule I

(a) Name and address of organization or government	(b) EIN	(c) IRC section (if applicable)	(d) Amount of cash grant	(h) Purpose of grant or assistance
(1) Banyan Global Inc 1120 20th Street Washington,DC20036	20-2926200		374,073	Malaria
(2) Catholic Relief Services 228 W Lexington St Baltimore,MD21201	13-5563422	501(c)(3)	1,473,458	MALARIA
(3) Cicatelli Associates Inc 505 8TH AVE FL 16 NEW YORK,NY10018	13-3020576	501(C)(3)	45,400	HIV/AIDS PROGRAM
(4) IDEOorg 444 SPEAR ST SAN FRANCISCO,CA94105	27-3755556	501(c)(3)	51,197	FAMILY PLANNING AND HEALTH SERVICES
(5) Jhpiego Corporation 1615 Thames St Baltimore,MD21231	23-7424444	501(c)(3)	6,933,927	Malaria
(6) Management Sciences for Health 200 Rivers Edge Drive Medford,MA02155	04-2482188	501(c)(3)	1,897,265	HIV Prevention
(7) Medical Care Development Inc 8401 Colesville Rd Silver Spring,MD20910	01-6022787	501(c)(3)	3,169,596	MALARIA
(8) PATH 2201 WESTLAKE AVE SEATTLE,WA98121	23-7313698	501(c)(3)	451,701	Sanitation
(9) Plan International USA Inc 155 PLAN WAY WARWICK,RI02886	13-5661832	501(c)(3)	752,625	SANITATION
(10) Regents Univ of California 1855 FOLSON ST San Francisco,CA94143	94-6002123	501(c)(3)	521,744	Family Planning and Health Services
(11) Results for Dev't Institute 1100 15TH ST WASHINGTON,DC20005	20-8530747	501(c)(3)	221,624	FAMILY PLANNING AND HEALTH SERVICES
(12) SNV USA 7514 Wisconsin Ave Ste 400 Bethesda,MD20814	90-0756603	501(c)(3)	1,040,443	Sanitation
(13) ThinkWell 1875 Connecticut Ave Washington,DC20009	45-2324600		14,779	GENDER BASED PROGRAMS
(14) Akros Inc 32 Campus Drive Skaggs Building Room 177 Missoula,MT59812	26-3668995		69,709	Malaria
(15) Clinton Health Access Initiative 383 Dorchester Ave Boston,MA02127	27-1414646	501(C)(3)	147,638	Malaria
(16) White Ribbon Alliance for Safe Motherhood 1901 Pennsylvania Ave No 800 Washington,DC20006	20-2029170	501(c)(3)	75,000	Family Planning and Health Services

Return Reference	Explanation
SCH I Part I, Line 2 Description of Procedure for Monitoring Use of Funds:	PSI HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT OUR SUBRECIPIENTS INCUR COSTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DONOR'S APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND PSI'S INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON SUBRECIPIENT MANAGEMENT. THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE WHEN PSI, AS A PRIMARY RECIPIENT OF DONOR FUNDS, AWARDS PART OF THE GRANT TO A SUBRECIPIENT. COMPLIANCE WITH DONOR IMPOSED AUDITS (PROGRAM SPECIFIC OR SINGLE AUDIT, FOR EXAMPLE) IS ONLY ONE OF THE MANY SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING TOOLS AVAILABLE. SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING SHOULD OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE YEAR OR THE PROJECT PERIOD AND NOT SOLELY RELY ON A YEARLY AUDIT. MONITORING THROUGH ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS CAN TAKE MANY FORMS. A FUNDAMENTAL MONITORING TOOL IS INFORMING THE SUBRECIPIENT OF THE BASIC AWARD INFORMATION (E.G. GRANT/CONTRACT AGREEMENT NUMBER, DONOR NAME, AWARD TERM) AND APPLICABLE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL MONITORING TOOLS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: - 1. REVIEWING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS SUBMITTED BY THE SUBRECIPIENT. 2. PERFORMING SITE VISITS AT THE SUBRECIPIENT'S OFFICES TO REVIEW FINANCIAL AND PROGRAMMATIC RECORDS AND OBSERVE OPERATIONS. 3. REGULAR CONTACT WITH THE SUBRECIPIENT AND MAKING APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES CONCERNING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND DOCUMENTING THE RESULTS OF THOSE INQUIRIES. 4. ARRANGING FOR AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES AND ENGAGEMENTS FOR CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION. DONOR LAWS AND REGULATIONS MAY IMPOSE SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO A PROGRAM. IN ADDITION, FACTORS SUCH AS THE SIZE OF THE AWARDS, PERCENTAGE OF THE PASS-THROUGH ENTITY'S TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDS AWARDED TO SUBRECIPIENTS, THE COMPLEXITY OF THE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND RISK OF SUBRECIPIENT NON-COMPLIANCE AS ASSESSED BY THE PASS-THROUGH ENTITY MAY INFLUENCE THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE MONITORING PROCEDURES. PROGRAM COMPLEXITY: PROGRAMS WITH COMPLEX COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS HAVE A HIGHER RISK OF NON-COMPLIANCE. PASS-THROUGH FUNDING: THE LARGER THE PERCENTAGE OF PROGRAM AWARDS PASSED THROUGH, THE GREATER THE NEED FOR PSI TO MONITOR THE SUBRECIPIENT. AMOUNT OF AWARD: LARGER DOLLAR AWARDS ARE OF GREATER RISK. SUBRECIPIENTS ARE EVALUATED AND ASSESSED TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A NEED FOR CLOSER MONITORING. IN GENERAL, SUBRECIPIENTS WHO HAVE NEVER RECEIVED FUNDING BEFORE WOULD REQUIRE CLOSER MONITORING. EXISTING SUBRECIPIENTS WILL BE EVALUATED ON AN ONGOING BASIS BASED ON RESULTS OF AWARD MONITORING AND SUBRECIPIENT AUDITS.

Return Reference

Explanation

SCH I Part I, Line 2 Description of Procedure for Monitoring Use of Funds:

PSI HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT OUR SUBRECIPIENTS INCUR COSTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DONOR'S APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND PSI'S INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON SUBRECIPIENT MANAGEMENT. THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE WHEN PSI, AS A PRIMARY RECIPIENT OF DONOR FUNDS, AWARDS PART OF THE GRANT TO A SUBRECIPIENT. COMPLIANCE WITH DONOR IMPOSED AUDITS (PROGRAM SPECIFIC OR SINGLE AUDIT, FOR EXAMPLE) IS ONLY ONE OF THE MANY SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING TOOLS AVAILABLE. SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING SHOULD OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE YEAR OR THE PROJECT PERIOD AND NOT SOLELY RELY ON A YEARLY AUDIT. MONITORING THROUGH ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS CAN TAKE MANY FORMS. A FUNDAMENTAL MONITORING TOOL IS INFORMING THE SUBRECIPIENT OF THE BASIC AWARD INFORMATION (E.G. GRANT/CONTRACT AGREEMENT NUMBER, DONOR NAME, AWARD TERM) AND APPLICABLE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL MONITORING TOOLS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: - 1. REVIEWING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS SUBMITTED BY THE SUBRECIPIENT. 2. PERFORMING SITE VISITS AT THE SUBRECIPIENT'S OFFICES TO REVIEW FINANCIAL AND PROGRAMMATIC RECORDS AND OBSERVE OPERATIONS. 3. REGULAR CONTACT WITH THE SUBRECIPIENT AND MAKING APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES CONCERNING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND DOCUMENTING THE RESULTS OF THOSE INQUIRIES. 4. ARRANGING FOR AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES AND ENGAGEMENTS FOR CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION. DONOR LAWS AND REGULATIONS MAY IMPOSE SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO A PROGRAM. IN ADDITION, FACTORS SUCH AS THE SIZE OF THE AWARDS, PERCENTAGE OF THE PASS-THROUGH ENTITY'S TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDS AWARDED TO SUBRECIPIENTS, THE COMPLEXITY OF THE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND RISK OF SUBRECIPIENT NON-COMPLIANCE AS ASSESSED BY THE PASS-THROUGH ENTITY MAY INFLUENCE THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE MONITORING PROCEDURES. PROGRAM COMPLEXITY: PROGRAMS WITH COMPLEX COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS HAVE A HIGHER RISK OF NON-COMPLIANCE. PASS-THROUGH FUNDING: THE LARGER THE PERCENTAGE OF PROGRAM AWARDS PASSED THROUGH, THE GREATER THE NEED FOR PSI TO MONITOR THE SUBRECIPIENT. AMOUNT OF AWARD: LARGER DOLLAR AWARDS ARE OF GREATER RISK. SUBRECIPIENTS ARE EVALUATED AND ASSESSED TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A NEED FOR CLOSER MONITORING. IN GENERAL, SUBRECIPIENTS WHO HAVE NEVER RECEIVED FUNDING BEFORE WOULD REQUIRE CLOSER MONITORING. EXISTING SUBRECIPIENTS WILL BE EVALUATED ON AN ONGOING BASIS BASED ON RESULTS OF AWARD MONITORING AND SUBRECIPIENT AUDITS.

Software ID:
Software Version: